Corruption of the U.S. Legal System and All Things Related

A Leading Pro Se's Perspective of Our Corrupt Legal System


facebook page

Attorney General Merrick Garland Needs to Apply the "Rule of Law" to Corrupt Federal Judges!


undefined

The attorney general of the United States, Merrick Garland, likes to publicly talk about the so called “rule of law”.  In his press conference addressing the warrant served at Trump’s property at Mar-a-Lago and the confiscating of boxes of documents, Garland said “Faithful adherence to the rule of law is the bedrock principle of the Justice Department and of our democracy.  Upholding the rule of law means applying the law evenly without fear or favor.  Under my watch, that is precisely what the Justice Department is doing.”  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11103507/Justice-Department-asks-judge-UNSEAL-search-warrant-Trumps-raid.html.      Garland needs to put his money where his mouth is.  He has a terrible track record of “Faithful adherence to the rule of law”.  With all due respect, "upholding the rule of law" is precisely NOT happening under his “watch” when it comes to federal judges who are breaking the laws of the United States.  It's almost as though they have diplomatic immunity from arrest and criminal prosecution.

Federal Judges Who Fix Cases and Court Officials Who Cover Up Case Fixing are Domestic Terrorists


undefined 

It is high time that we as a country finally come to the realization that our federal judiciary is infested with judicial terrorists who have been and continue to be on a mission to deprive “we the people” of our rights. Yes, indeed, there are actually federal statutes in place that criminalize judges who choose to violate the laws of the United States. These statutes are as follows:

Why Is The U.S. Court Administration So Secretive About Judge Michael S. Kanne?


undefined

We have a very serious problem in the county with judicial malfeasance issues which are being swept under the rug by federal court officials at every turn.  Case in point is what is currently taking place in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago and the federal judiciary’s protectionism of case fixing.

Hey Dick Durbin and Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Where Are you Hiding?


 undefined

The old saying “money talks” is no more true anywhere than it is in the federal judiciary when it comes to cases involving corporations or business entities against individuals, the judiciary overwhelmingly sides in favor of business, where case fixing is not the exception, but the rule.  When it is corporate money that is doing the talking, the federal judges are indeed listening.  https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2017/06/26/why-big-business-keeps-winning-at-the-supreme-court/https://reason.com/volokh/2021/03/09/testifying-on-whats-wrong-with-the-supreme-court-the-big-money-assault-on-our-judiciary/.  The late-great Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg tried to tell us something when she said that business clients “can pay for the best counsel money can buy” and indeed they very often get what they pay for.  https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/big-business-keeps-winning-at-the-supreme-court/564260/.

Blog - Home