It is high time that we as a country finally come to the realization that our federal judiciary is infested with judicial terrorists who have been and continue to be on a mission to deprive “we the people” of our rights. Yes, indeed, there are actually federal statutes in place that criminalize judges who choose to violate the laws of the United States. These statutes are as follows:
18 U.S. Code Sec. 2
(a) “Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets,
counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as
(b) “Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by
him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable
as a principal.”
18 U.S. Code Sec. 3
“Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been
committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to
hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after
18 U.S. Code Sec. 4
”Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”
The problem is judicial corruption is rampant in federal courtrooms all across the country and even though there are federal statutes in place to hold the criminal judges in check, there is a major shortage of federal prosecutors who have the backbone to prosecute these criminal judges, and unfortunately adding to the problem is the media who has shown that for the most part it would rather kiss up to the judicial brotherhood rather than actually do a service to the country and report on this very serious problem. I have the proof of all of the above.
In February 2018, retired Judge Richard A. Posner appointed me to serve as the executive director of the Posner Center of Justice for Pro Se’s and in March 2018, I traveled to Chicago for a meeting with Judge Posner where Judge Posner disclosed to me that during the pendency of my appeal of a civil rights case against Valparaiso Indiana police years ago that Judge Michael S. Kanne had initiated an ex parte conversation with Judge Posner during an appeal I had in the civil rights case against Valparaiso Indiana police who had been tormenting me with numerous false arrests, none of which stood up in court. Judge Posner told me that Kanne "had it in for" me and disclosed to me that Kanne had asked Judge Posner in ex parte fashion —as a "favor" to Judge Kanne— to make sure that I did not prevail in my appeal against the Valparaiso police as Judge Posner was on the panel, to which Kanne was not. Judge Posner admitted that he succumbed to Kanne's "pressure" and accommodated Kanne's "request" to have the district court's erroneous decision in favor of the Valparaiso police affirmed even though Judge Posner knew that it "should have been reversed." Judge Posner confessed that he knew what he did "was wrong," but that this was "something that judges did for one another from time to time." Judge Posner then acknowledged to me that Kanne was a "corrupt judge" who fixed cases and that Kanne should have never been a member of the federal judiciary.
With the information disclosed to me by Judge Posner, I filed a judicial-misconduct complaint against Kanne with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago. Knowing that the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago is a corrupt court, I exercised my right to request that the Chief Justice of the United States transfer the proceeding to the judicial council of another circuit pursuant to Rule 26. However, Sykes and her cohorts refused to request that the Chief Justice of the United States transfer the proceeding to another circuit, and chose instead to keep the complaint in house where they could try to sweep the matter under the rug.
On September 30, 2021, the so called Judicial Council of the Seventh Circuit via Chief Judge Diane S. Sykes issued a Memorandum and Order dismissing the judicial-misconduct complaint on ridiculous technical grounds and not on the merits. The order showed only Sykes’ name, as chief judge, and did not show the names of any other judges who participated in the decision. The order contained no "on the record" statement of denial by Kanne of the allegations against him that he had the civil rights decision fixed as was disclosed by Judge Posner.
On November 9, 2021, I filed a petition for review with the Seventh Circuit of its infected decision in dismissing the judicial-misconduct complaint against Kanne where I pointed out in great detail the significant flaws and impropriety of the September 30, 2021 order by Sykes and her minions. On January 20, 2022, the so called “Judicial Council of the Seventh Circuit” issued an order denying the petition for review and affirmed Sykes’ memorandum and order of September 30, 2021. The order stated that it was a “final decision” and that “The complainant is not entitled to any further review” which was not at all true as federal law indeed provides that a complainant who files a judicial-misconduct complaint against a federal judge which has been dismissed by a judicial council circuit has a right to file a petition for review under 28 U.S. Code Sec. 357. 28 U.S. Code Sec. 357(a) explicitly states that “A complainant or judge aggrieved by an action of the judicial council under section 354 may petition the Judicial Conference of the United States for review thereof. 28 U.S. Code Sec. 357(b) explicitly states that “The Judicial Conference, of the standing committee established under section 331, may grant a petition by a complainant or judge under subsection (a) of 28 U.S. Code § 357. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/357.
The Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Chris Conway, has refused to provide the names of the judges who participated in the memorandum and order by Diane S. Sykes and her undisclosed judicial minions notwithstanding that I requested him to provide that information in an email on October 4, 2021.
On February 5, 2022, I filed with the Judicial Conference of the United States in Washington, D.C., a petition for review of the Seventh Circuit’s actions as to the issue of the case fixing and protectionism of it in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago, but all indications are that the petition is being swept under the rug as the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, headed by Rosalyn Mauskopf, refuses to provide a status report as to where things are at with respect to the petition. I can’t honestly say that I’m surprised that Mauskopf’s office is so interested in sweeping my petition under the rug since Mauskopf has shown what she is made of when in 2021 when members of both parties introduced a much need bill —the Judiciary Accountability Act of 2021— that was to provide some much needed protection for judicial employees subjected to sexual harassment by judges and other high level court officials, Rosalyn Mauskopf, as director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, put things in motion to prevent the bill from being passed, which of course preserved the status quo of the federal judges using the federal employees as their sex toys. On August 25, 2021, Mauskopf wrote a letter to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees opposing the enactment of the proposed bill stating in both letters that the bill "interferes with the internal governance of the Third Branch" and that the Judiciary should "through the decentralized administration of the federal courts" be allowed to "govern itself". https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/house_letter_jaa.pdf, https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/senate_letter_jaa.pdf, https://www.uscourts.gov/news/2021/08/25/judiciary-informs-congress-its-opposition-bill. This tells us what we need to know about Rosalyn Mauskopf in terms of her credibility and integrity. The fact that Mauskopf thwarted efforts to protect judicial employees from sexual harassment by judges and other high level court officials tells me where she is at with respect to her office’s concealment of my petition that addresses the case fixing and cover up going on at the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago. The problem is, Mauskopf is more interested in keeping the federal judiciary as a secret society where it can continue to operate in a clandestine manner in order that the public continue to be kept in the dark about the judiciary's corrupt activities. In essence, she is covering for judicial criminals who are violating the laws of the United States.
Case fixing by federal judges and cover up of it is against the laws of the United States. The Seventh Circuit’s protectionism under the leadership of Chief Judge Diane S. Sykes and her judicial minions of Michael S. Kanne’s criminal conduct of having a decision fixed in violation of the United States laws renders the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit as a criminal enterprise pursuant to the standards that the Seventh Circuit itself set in U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985) when the Seventh Circuit held that the Circuit Court of Cook County was a criminal enterprise by virtue of the judges’ failure to report the criminal activities of other judges, just as Chief Judge Diane S. Sykes and her undisclosed judicial minions have likewise failed to report to law enforcement authorities the criminal activities of Michael S. Kanne —which Kanne has not denied on the record— as disclosed by Judge Posner renders Sykes and all of partner in crime minions who are involved in the cover up as criminals under 18 U.S. Code Sec. 2, 18 U.S. Code Sec. 3 and 18 U.S. Code Sec. 4.
According to the Supreme Court, any judge who does not comply with his/her oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in an act of treason. S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821). This makes Kanne and Sykes and her judicial minions treasonous judges according to the Supreme Court’s precedents. Plain and simple, federal judges who kill people's rights to fairness and justice and judges who help cover it up are judicial terrorists.
The law is the law, and it is supposed to be so for judges as well, but unfortunately we have an asleep-at-the-wheel attorney general in Merrick Garland who has a demonstrated propensity to protect judicial corruption since he looked the other way when he was a judge as well, so I don’t look for him to prosecute any of the corrupt judges at the U.S. Court of Appeals anytime soon, or ever for that matter. Garland is much too spineless to do so. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/03/time-merrick-garland-was-accused-protecting-fellow-judge-charged-ethics-violations/. Because of the lack of credibility in the Department of Justice, federal judges know they can get away with corruptions such as the corruption taking place in the Seventh Circuit even though they have committed criminal acts in violation of the federal statutes.
Also unfortunate is the fact that we have a House and Senate Judiciary Committee made up of wimps who choose to cuddle up with the miscreants of the federal judiciary who they know are violating the laws of the United States rather than holding them accountable. The checks and balances we have as a society is the fact that we have such committees available to us to investigate corrupt judges, but we as a society don’t get any help there either as the members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees choose to cater to the judicial criminals rather than protecting the public from these judicial miscreants which could be done by holding public hearings and taking steps to remove them. Case in point, I have asked a U.S. Senator in my state, Todd Young, to request to the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Dick Durbin, and the other committee members, to hold public hearings as to the case fixing and cover up going on at the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago and the lack of action from the U.S. Judicial Conference that is supposed to take action on the petition I filed, but refuses to do so notwithstanding that it is obligated by federal statute to take a majority vote under federal statute —28 U.S. Code Sec. 355(a). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/355. Another problem insofar as Senator Todd Young is concerned is that he told me that he wrote a letter to the federal agency on my behalf but when I asked his office to show me a copy of the letter that Young said he wrote, his office refuses to show it to me, and that is a red flag which results in a reasonable question as to whether he actually wrote any such letter. The fact that Todd Young refuses to show me a copy of a letter he said he wrote for me is very suspect and there is a consequential question as to whether he lied about it.
Indeed there is a major effort by the federal judiciary to somehow refuse to follow the law and ignore my petition which addresses the case fixing and cover up at the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago as was disclosed to me by Judge Richard A. Posner. The case has been made and the federal judiciary knows it, and that is exactly why it is involved in the unlawful efforts to sweep my petition under the rug. Chief Judge Diane S. Sykes and Judge Michael S. Kanne are making a big mistake if they are so stupid as to think that I will be going away simply because they have such corrupt judicial protection. Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Dick Durbin and his minions on the Committee, and also the House Judiciary Committee minions, are also stupid if they think I will be going away anytime soon simply by their cavalier choice to allow the judicial corruption to continue on as business as usual as if we the people don’t know what is going on. Rosalyn Mauskopf is very stupid if she thinks she is going to be able to continue to hide the fact of my petition in favor of protecting the criminal judges who are violating the laws of the United States. And Senator Todd Young is very stupid if he thinks that by refusing my request to ask the Senate Judiciary Committee to hold public hearings as to the case fixing and cover up at the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago and the lack of action from the U.S. Judicial Conference that is required under federal statute 28 U.S. Code Sec. 355(a) will go unnoticed and the issue will quietly go away. That is not going to happen. Wearing a black robe does not give judicial terrorists the right to violate the laws of the United States. The law is the law, and the law indeed applies also to criminals who wear black robes!